I’m a literary snob. I tend to look down my nose at stories with a surprise ending, a “twist in the tail”. They seem to me gimmicky and superficial. And yet, I have been struck by a disturbing question: is surprise, after all, what writing is about?
A good story always has us eager to know what comes next. But now think about a bad story. It’s plodding and predictable. We know what’s going to come next—the bad king will be overthrown, the princess will marry the peasant, who will, of course, turn out to be a prince and the true heir. If we can predict what’s coming next, why would we read on? So, logically, a good story must have surprise.
This is what cognitive scientist Vera Tobin argues in her book Elements of Surprise. The book shows how the glitches in our cognition works informs the way successful plots are constructed. Jane Austen’s Emma, for example, turns on the consequences of the protagonist’s mistaken belief that she is an accomplished matchmaker. She has great difficulty imagining that, once she has arrived at an interpretation of events, others could think otherwise. The surprise comes when she realises that she, after all, loves Mr Knightly.
Twists and jokes
Twists, or surprises, can work in different ways. In the classic version, the reader is led to believe things are one way, and then that belief is turned on its head. The scattering of clues must be sufficient for the ending to seem inevitable, and yet they must be sufficiently disguised not to be noticed. This, of course, is the recipe for the detective story. It is also the recipe for the joke.
Two gay men watch a beautiful woman hipping her way down the street. One sighs and turns to the other, saying “it’s at times like this you wish you were a lesbian”.
The mind is led down one path, only to be shown at the end a completely different meaning to the chain of events. The natural physiological response is the sudden explosive exhalation we call a laugh.
The problem with this version of the surprise is that it only works once. There is nothing to the lead-up that would hold our attention once we know how it will end. Once we know the punchline, once we know the butler did it, the magic is gone.
Twist in the tail and twist in the character
But I now realise there other kinds of surprise. And Tobin holds the key to them. She argues that two “flaws” in cognition are at the heart of stories, and at the heart of social interaction. The first is our difficulty in understanding that others may be different from us. The second is the “curse of knowledge” – we find it hard to model the mental states of people who don’t know something that we do. There is infinite room for fashioning dramatic misunderstandings in these two facts.
Since a character with a desire creates a plot, I suppose a character change is a form of “twist in the tail”. But it’s a more satisfying one, and one to which we will return again and again. Our reaction is less like that to a joke and more like that to a loved one.
But, I think there is more than just surprise available here. There is also delight and understanding. Fiction allows us to experience the one thing we can never really know—what the inside of someone else’s head feels like. When a character in whom we are invested undergoes change we experience a twist in the character. And, if the author has achieved the trick of making the change both inevitable and surprising, we understand something profound about ourselves and others.
It all makes sense
There is, perhaps, yet a third kind of story. It’s like a numinous form of the first, the twist story. In this kind, the writer reveals to us how the world works, or at least how their world works. There is an aesthetic pleasure of discovery when we understand how all the pieces fit together. Vicariously, it’s like experiencing the “aha moment” of a scientific discovery. When we have the whole picture, suddenly it all makes sense.
What kinds of surprise work best for you in a story?
4 thoughts on “106. Story tricks: making surprise work for you”
In my view the best form of short story will have a satisfactory conclusion and at the same time leave the reader in a quandary. The reader, in my view, must be left pondering why it ended the way it did and perhaps feel compelled to read the story again to confirm their conclusion. I am not talking about leading the reader astray by subterfuge, but instead giving the opportunity for an alternative and varied interpretation of the story.
I would agree this immediate response may not work for a novel where the reader has invested more time with the characters, therefore the ‘surprise’ needs to be justified and plausible as well as satisfactory. e.g. the villain should not get away with it, unless there is more to come in the next book.
In my short story version of ‘Snow White’ for example, the ending is not that of a traditional fairy tale, and therefore a surprise. However, in the context of a quest it works.
I think, if I understan you right, that’s what I mean by inevitable surprise. Thanks for your response, James
I smile every time I re-read your joke, the enjoyment doesn’t diminish for knowing the outcome.
In terms of story structure, I think I prefer the ‘aha’ moment, when the writer has given us all we need to know but one additional piece of information or a change of context turns the reader’s perception and understanding. With all surprise/ twists we need to be fed throughout, as an unexpected and in no way set-up reveal at the end is disappointing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That point about feeding and concluding for yourself is an insightful one, Sarah. Thanks