
There was something studiedly noble about the way he drew himself to full height in the dock, hands grasping his lapels, silver head canted.
“There is no freedom, nothing more important,” he declared, “than our right to say what we think. Our liberty itself is on trial here.”
The prosecution, of course, showed the pictures of torched villages and bodies spasmed in final agony. Witnesses testified to the sudden and savage explosion of hate.
“It was just a speech,” the Minister said. “You couldn’t expect me to foresee what goes on in other people’s heads.”
Friday fictioneers is a weekly challenge set by Rochelle Wisoff Fields to write a 100-word story in response to a photo prompt. You can find other stories here
Oh frighteningly real!
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thanks so much, Louise
LikeLiked by 1 person
Chilling. A certain person comes to mind but I won’t mention the name.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I follow you, but I think that trait goes wider than the wee orange bampot
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh! I love that! Will call “him” that often now. My husband will appreciate me not say a*****e every time I hear his name.
LikeLike
It’s what a man in the street called him during his visit to Scotland
LikeLike
You’re opening up a minefield there. How much free speech is too much free speech?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m not sure it’s a minefield, but I’m sure there will be disagreement
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dear Neil,
It is interesting that we both went to court this week, isn’t it? One has to wonder just how far liberty will go and how long it will last. Good one.
Shalom,
Rochelle
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks so much, Rochelle. The ethical problem is, of course, that there is more than one liberty. Balancing them is the essence of the problem
LikeLiked by 1 person
enjoyed the comments as much as your fiction – 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
The power of words! You’ve written a huge story here, Neil. Very cleverly done.
Susan A Eames at
Travel, Fiction and Photos
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much, Susan
LikeLike
A dark story with a serious message, a message that is so often taken for granted.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much, James
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is great, Neil. The fruit of revolution is appallingly similar across history, whether it was the Taiping, the French, or the Russian: fine speeches and high ideals followed by heads rolling and blood-filled streets.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thanks, Joshua. Didn’t you have a spot of bother with the Brits in 1776? How did that turn out?
LikeLike
You’re seeing it unfold now. A lot of grand words about egalitarianism in a country with legalized slavery. A system of supposed democracy designed to concentrate power in the hands of the elite. It looks good on paper, but in practice it is very different. Slavery, genocide of the native peoples, contempt for the environment all built in to the system. What we are seeing now is The Logical conclusion.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sad he has not control over what his freedom of expression results into. But agree, freedom of expression is sacrosanct.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think he’s probably being disingenuous. He knew full well what the consequences of his speech would be
LikeLike
It wasn’t the wee orange bampot who came into my mind but a tousled tow-head. I’m sure you’ve captured the essence of his plea in favour of hate speech.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Penny
LikeLike
“It wasn’t me boss”. As you say, disingenuous in the extreme. I spent a long time considering the word ‘studiedly’ and thinking how that must be one of the ugliest words in the English language. Nice observation of a not so nice situation.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Thanks, Sandra
LikeLike
powerful social message here
🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I hope so
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is so scary it gives me goose bumps. We have several people in our government who think they get away with that kind of talk. I didn’t mean it like that, etc. etc. Perfect description of hypocrisy. innocence.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Scratch the innocence. I want an edit button. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much. I’m glad it resonated
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes there is freedom of speech… but there are also dire consequences… freedom without responsibility is just chaos.
LikeLiked by 4 people
You got it!
LikeLike
A subject I’ve written poems about many times… 🙂
LikeLike
Well put, Bjorn. Free speech + responsibility they should be stapled together. My mother always taught me to think before you speak and when I was in the pits of angst and convinced the pen was mightier than the sword, she told me to sit on it. Then, once I became a parent, I was told about consequences. When you’re child breaks the rules, there need to be consequences. This is also something that becomes problematic with our leaders.
We have a former Prime Minister here in Australia Tony Abbott who always says and does what he likes and yet still has his seat. It’s clear he needs to go and yet he sat for pre-selection of his seat this week and went in unopposed. This was where he could be stopped in his tracks altogether. However, despite trying top stack the branch, he’s still in: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/sep/15/tony-abbott-re-endorsed-as-liberal-candidate-for-warringah-despite-protest-vote
Makes me think a lot about the realities of democracy.
Best wishes,
Rowena
LikeLiked by 1 person
The last line says it all about this character…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Michael
LikeLike
the sudden and savage explosion of hate. – What did he say to cause such an explosion? Your short tale left me wanting more. A good thing, I must say.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We may never know, but he probably traded on ethnic or religious differences
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nothing worse than using something like the “right to free speech” to go over and beyond what is right.
LikeLiked by 3 people
A convenient cloak for hate speech
LikeLike
Indeed.
LikeLike
That’s an interesting question Neil, one I too agonize over a lot as a self-professed ‘liberal’. Where does one draw a line? If people are idiotic, and evil enough to let someone’s words drive them to heinous crimes and lynchings, is it really fair to blame the speaker? I don’t have an answer, honestly. Intuitively, he seems to be responsible, but if we take the emotions away from the decision-making…I don’t know.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If someone presses a button, knowing the consequences, do you blame the button? Or the person who decides to press it?
LikeLiked by 2 people
But that presupposes that humans are brainless buttons, not rational beings.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Evidence for Homo Economicus, the rational human, is sparse in financial crashes and pogroms
LikeLike
Nothing changes really. A very powerful story.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much
LikeLiked by 1 person
Whilst it’s important to allow free speech it needs to be carefully used to avoid it becoming a weapon.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, Keith
LikeLike
This was chilling.With every right comes an equal dose of responsibility. well written.
https://ideasolsi65.blogspot.com/2018/09/uncertain.html
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly. Rights are not untrammelled. Thanks so much
LikeLike
Ooooo good piece. I so believe this can and might happen. Well written Neil if a little frightening
LikeLiked by 1 person
Or perhaps it already has. Thanks, Laurie
LikeLiked by 1 person
You squeezed a lot into this story. It reminds me of endless arguments I’ve had over freedom of speech – a tricky one to untangle and impressive to do it in a hundred words.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much, El
LikeLike
Topical, topical and all around the world unfortunately. Nice one.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much
LikeLiked by 1 person
As others have said, a huge subject described so powerfully in 100 words. Great writing Neil.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much
LikeLike
Words can ignite an inferno.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They can. We need to think before we speak
LikeLike
I think we misunderstand the idea of “free” speech. Nicely written and thought-provoking story, Neil.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much, Brenda
LikeLiked by 1 person
A topical issue and I guess it is happening everywhere. Very well-crafted story
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much, Piyali
LikeLiked by 2 people
Outstanding, Neil. You’ve said so much in few words.
Isadora 😎
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much, Isadora
LikeLiked by 1 person
The recognition of the importance of words, freedom, but also their ability to sway toward destruction. Well done, Neil!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much, Sascha
LikeLiked by 1 person
There are always some who will employ nefarious tactics to further their own agenda. Nicely done.
LikeLike
Thanks so much, Jo
LikeLiked by 1 person
So realistic to life. You packed an awful lot into a 100 words here. Great job!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much, Lisa
LikeLiked by 1 person
You present the dilemma so well. Is it the thought or the actions it provokes that should be on trial? Chilling when taken to its extremes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much, Sarah
LikeLike
Good story. It certainly provides for reflection.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Dawn
LikeLiked by 1 person
A very timely piece that raises many questions. How much responsibility does one speaker (or social media platform come to that) have for others’ reaction to their words? When, if at all, does opinion become incitement? Can it be incitement if it wasn’t intended as such? Does freedom of speech mean freedom to offend?
I’ll leave it to those on Question Time and in the various Houses to debate…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much. Those are just the sort of questions I wanted to provoke.
LikeLike
👍
LikeLike
There’s free speech and there is violent rioting. Hatred and opportunity can lead to nasty places.
LikeLiked by 1 person
He was only making a speech. He says.
LikeLike
This raises pertinent questions around the debate of free speech and responsibility
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks. Michael
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great, thought-provoking story, Neil. Too often people hide behind the idea of Freedom of speech to promote views that bring about divisiveness and dire consequences. Freedom of speech right now allows people to say whatever they want irregardless of how it would affect others.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much. All rights are interconnected. The right to free speech is not a licence to whip up hate
LikeLiked by 1 person